October 2015 – Another Record Month

The Office of Open Records received a record number of appeals in October, marking the third time this year a new record has been set. The top five busiest months ever, and six of the top seven, are from this year.

Here’s a look at the top 10 busiest months in the history of the OOR:

  1. Oct. 2015 — 353 appeals received
  2. Aug. 2015 — 344
  3. Sept. 2015 — 328
  4. June 2015 — 313
  5. July 2015 — 261
  6. Sept. 2013 — 244
  7. April 2015 — 241
  8. Oct. 2013 — 240
  9. Aug. 2013 — 235
  10. Aug. 2012 — 231

Through the end of October, the OOR has received 2,468 appeals in 2015. That’s just 10 appeals short of the record set in 2013, making it a certainty that 2015 will be the busiest year ever for the OOR.

Supreme Court: OOR is Unique, Independent

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania today issued a ruling which holds that the Office of Open Records is “a unique and sui generis independent body” and that its executive director is not an at-will employee.

I believe the Office of Open Records must be independent to work as it was intended, and I’m thrilled the Supreme Court agreed. I’m excited to continue working as the head of this office. It’s an incredible team.

Here are the majority opinion, authored by Justice Baer and joined by Chief Justice Saylor and Justice Eakin, and a dissenting opinion, authored by Justice Todd:

Majority Opinion
Dissenting Opinion

OOR Annual Training – Presentation Materials

The Office of Open Records held its annual training session in Harrisburg this week, covering the Right-to-Know Law and the Sunshine Act.

PCN very graciously recorded the presentation and has made streaming video of the OOR’s training session available for free:
PCN Video Part 1
PCN Video Part 2

Here’s the presentation I used for my opening comments:
Annual Training 2015 Opening Comments (PDF)
Annual Training 2015 Opening Comments (PPTX)

And here’s the presentation George Spiess, our Director of Training and Outreach, used for his session:
Annual Training 2015 George Spiess Session (PDF)
Annual Training 2015 George Spiess Session (PPTX)

Thanks again to the Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission and to the State Museum of Pennsylvania for hosting us, and to Senator Dominic Pileggi for saying a few words at the start of the session.

Opening Comments – OOR Annual Training

Today, the Office of Open Records is hosting its annual training session in Harrisburg, covering the Right-to-Know Law and the Sunshine Act.

Here’s the presentation I’m using for my opening comments:
Annual Training 2015 Opening Comments (PDF)
Annual Training 2015 Opening Comments (PPTX)

I’ll post the presentation used by George Spiess, our Director of Training and Outreach, soon. Also, complete video from the event will be available courtesy of PCN.

Last Call: OOR Annual Training Tomorrow (10/21)

The Office of Open Records’ 2015 Annual Training in Harrisburg is scheduled to take place tomorrow (Wednesday, Oct. 21, 2015) — and it’s not too late for you to join us.

This session will cover both the Right-to-Know Law (also known as the Open Records Law) and the Sunshine Act (also known as the Open Meetings Law), including a discussion of significant recent OOR rulings and court decisions impacting the laws. Attendees will be able to ask questions.

If you’re a lawyer, you can also get 1.5 CLEs.

Registration is free, and the event is pending approval for 1.5 CLE credits.

Register online at http://oor-training-2015.eventbrite.com/

Podcast: Common Mistakes Made by Requesters

Podcast Logo CroppedThe third episode of the Open Records in Pennsylvania podcast is now available.

This time around, George Spiess (Chief of Training and Outreach for the Office of Open Records) and I discussed common mistakes made by requesters — said another way, how to make your requests for government records in Pennsylvania more efficient.

If you’ve ever filed a Right-to-Know request, or you think you might in the future, this episode (all 22 minutes and 35 seconds of it) is for you.

Subscribe:
Open Records in Pennsylvania podcast on iTunes

Listen:

Download:
Episode 3 of the Open Records in Pennsylvania podcast

If you have ideas for future episodes of the podcast, I’d love to hear from you. Share your thoughts in the comments below, tweet to @ErikOpenRecords or @OpenRecordsPA, or send an email to openrecords (at) pa (dot) gov.

Theme music by Pennsylvania’s own John Austin.

The RTKL and Grand Juries

In a recent appeal, the Office of Open Records confronted the issue of how Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law intersects with the state’s Investigating Grand Jury Act.

The OOR’s Final Determination in Hockeimer v. City of Harrisburg (Docket No.: AP 2015-1793) held that:

“In the instant matter, it is clear that the requested records exist independently of any grand jury investigation. The Request seeks records, including financial records, created by the City and various City personnel over the course of several years for various purposes in relation to the City’s operations. There is no evidence demonstrating that any of the requested records were created for use by the grand jury. Accordingly … the requested records are subject to disclosure under the RTKL.”

The Investigating Grand Jury Act, as a general rule, prohibits “disclosure of matters occurring before the grand jury.” Thus, the meaning of the phrase “occurring before the grand jury” becomes very important in this analysis.

As the Final Determination held, “There is little authority available in Pennsylvania jurisprudence which clarifies the meaning of ‘occurring before the grand jury.’ Consequently, the OOR looks to federal law for guidance.” (The wording of the federal grand jury law is very similar to the wording of Pennsylvania’s.)

Under federal case law, “information does not become a matter occurring before a grand jury simply by being presented to the grand jury, particularly where it was developed independently of the grand jury.” Further, “it has been well-established in this Circuit for over 14 years that if documents exist independently of the grand jury process, they are not matters occurring before the grand jury for purposes of Rule 6(e).” (Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) deals with the secrecy of grand jury proceedings.) And, “The mere fact that a particular document is reviewed by a grand jury does not convert it into a ‘matter occurring before a grand jury’ within the meaning of Rule 6(e).”

As a result of this analysis, the OOR ordered the City of Harrisburg to release the requested records.

According to a report on Pennlive.com, the City “will appeal the Office of Open Records ruling with the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas.”

Senator Dominic Pileggi to Open OOR’s Annual Training

HARRISBURG – The Office of Open Records (OOR) will conduct its annual training on the Right-to-Know Law and Sunshine Act on Wednesday, Oct. 21. Senator Dominic Pileggi, author of Pennsylvania’s current Right-to-Know Law, will open the session.

“The Right-to-Know Law and the Sunshine Act are fundamental to government transparency in Pennsylvania,” said Erik Arneson, Executive Director of the OOR. “I’m particularly excited that Senator Pileggi has agreed to say a few words at the start of this year’s session.”

The free session will cover the basics of both the Right-to-Know Law (also known as the Open Records Law) and the Sunshine Act (also known as the Open Meetings Law), including a discussion of recent significant OOR rulings and court decisions impacting the laws.

“The issue of government transparency has never been more prominent than it is today,” Arneson said. “This session is designed to give both agencies and citizens the latest information about the Right-to-Know Law and the Sunshine Act in an easy-to-understand way.”

The training, which has been approved for 1.5 continuing legal education credits (CLEs), will be conducted on Wednesday, Oct. 21, 2015 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. in the Pennsylvania State Museum auditorium, 300 N. 3rd St., Harrisburg. It will also be recorded and aired by PCN, the Pennsylvania Cable Network.

The event is free and open to everyone, including citizens, public officials, agency employees, and members of the media. Registration is highly recommended as seating is limited. Online registration is available at http://oor-training-2015.eventbrite.com.

September 2015 Appeals – Another Busy Month

Another month, another busy month here at the Office of Open Records.

September was down — slightly — from the record-breaking level of August, but it’s still the second-busiest month on record in terms of appeals received. We received 328 appeals in September.

Here’s a look at the top 10 busiest months in the history of the OOR:

  1. Aug. 2015 — 344 appeals received
  2. Sept. 2015 — 328
  3. June 2015 — 313
  4. July 2015 — 261
  5. Sept. 2013 — 244
  6. April 2015 — 241
  7. Oct. 2013 — 240
  8. Aug. 2013 — 235
  9. Aug. 2012 — 231
  10. April 2013 — 222

Through the end of September, the OOR has received 2,115 appeals in 2015. That already ranks 2015 as the third-busiest year on record, and we have three full months to go.

New Appeal Form Available

As a general rule, when a government agency denies access to records in Pennsylvania, the requester can appeal to the Office of Open Records.

Today, the OOR published a new Appeal Form. Our goal was to make it easier to understand and simpler to complete. The new form is available on the OOR website in two versions:

If you prefer a standard PDF rather than a fillable PDF, that’s available here:

Much more information about how to file an appeal is also available on the OOR website.

Previously, there were two Appeal Forms: one for standard denials, and one for “deemed denials.” (A “deemed denial” occurs when an agency doesn’t respond to a requester within the time limit established by the Right-to-Know Law.) The new Appeal Form replaces both of the previous versions. The OOR will still accept appeals filed on the previous forms.